ChristianDiscussion.com Forum Index ChristianDiscussion.com
Public Christian Discussion and Christian Debate Forums
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 


Women as pastors/priests


Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ChristianDiscussion.com Forum Index -> Christian Bible Discussion
Author Message
Glorfindel
Tadpole



Joined: 11 Aug 2003

Posts: 28

Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2003 8:36 am    Post subject: Women as pastors/priests Reply with quote

I know that this can be quite a 'hot potato' for some people, anyone got any views ??

Personally I am in favour of women as ministers.
Back to top
Nobby
Board - Admin



Joined: 03 Oct 2003

Posts: 284

Location: Palmyra,Missouri USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2003 10:21 am    Post subject: Women as pastors/priests Reply with quote

Hi Glorfindel,

Glorfindel wrote:
I know that this can be quite a 'hot potato' for some people,

In times past most of our churches wrinkeled their noses at it.
They didn't want the ladies to take part in anything that had to do with leadership.
Yes I'm glad that the men are finally waking up, & allowing the ladies to take part in leadership I think it is "great"
The ladies have been looked down on far to long in our churches.

Women as pastors/priests, hummmmmmm.... Very Happy have to say I've heard some very, very good ones.


Last edited by Nobby on Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:22 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Glorfindel
Tadpole



Joined: 11 Aug 2003

Posts: 28

Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 7:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It seems we are all in agreement then ...
Back to top
RevJP
Puppy



Joined: 01 Oct 2003

Posts: 214

Location: State of Grace

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 7:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

no, not really....
Back to top
Glorfindel
Tadpole



Joined: 11 Aug 2003

Posts: 28

Location: UK

PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2003 8:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So what do you think then??
Back to top
paul
Little Goldfish



Joined: 04 Oct 2003

Posts: 51


PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2003 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i'm not sure,what does the word of God say?
i would have nothing against it,but i believe we have to go with what the word teaches.

God bless.
paul
Back to top
RevJP
Puppy



Joined: 01 Oct 2003

Posts: 214

Location: State of Grace

PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2003 2:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yep, I'm with Paul on this. It doesn't matter what I 'think' about it. Scripture isn't dependent upon my designs. I'll go with scripture, not culture.
Back to top
Glorfindel
Tadpole



Joined: 11 Aug 2003

Posts: 28

Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 8:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not even when you take in to account the cultural context that Paul was writing ??

We also need to remember that there are differences of opinion on the correct translation of some of the Greek. For example when Paul says that man is the head of every woman, the word head can be translated as head (as in head of the body) or source as in the source of a river.

Scripture also tells us that man and woman were created as equals!

Fin x
Back to top
RevJP
Puppy



Joined: 01 Oct 2003

Posts: 214

Location: State of Grace

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Not even when you take in to account the cultural context that Paul was writing ??

For one, I cannot accept the idea of dismissing scripture based on our idea of cultural context. I have faith that my Lord's Holy Inspired Word is free from the nuances of man's infidelity.

You point about the proper translation regarding the 'head' is a good one and I would not base my beliefs in a woman's role in the CHURCH on scripture which relates to the role of husband and wife.

Here are some exerpts from this discussion on a sister site:

ENOCH said:
Quote:
Is your question, "Is a woman Biblically forbidden to be a pastor on the basis of culture--or morality ?" If it's not, I'm not sure I understood your latest point. (But, it's kinda late for me to be posting, anyway).

Frankly, I don't think culture has anything to do with it. The people Paul was ministering to were primarily Gentiles who had their background in pagan religions which commonly not only accepted, but required the use of women as priests. So, from a cultural point, there is nothing that would indicate his statement was to comply with a cultural tradition. A male-only priesthood WASN'T a tradition to the people he was speaking to.

I have heard all sorts of argument in favor of women as pastors, and none has been able to explain WHY the issue was brought up unless the recent converts were trying to institute the same operating procedures which they had been accustomed to already. And, of course, that shoots down the cultural argument flat cold.

If you study the religions at the time, you'll find it very common for women to be in charge of entire pagan temples.



Quote:
Matthew Henry's commentary:
According to St. Paul, women are not allowed to be public teachers in the church; for teaching is an office of authority. But good women may and ought to teach their children at home the principles of true religion. Also, women must not think themselves excused from learning what is necessary to salvation, though they must not usurp authority. As woman was last in the creation, which is one reason for her subjection, so she was first in the transgression

11Let a woman learn in quietness, in entire submissiveness.
12I allow no woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to remain in quietness and keep silence [in religious assemblies].
13For Adam was first formed, then Eve;(1)
14And it was not Adam who was deceived, but [the] woman who was deceived and deluded and fell into transgression.(2)


John Wesley's Notes On The Bible:
To usurp authority over the man - By public teaching.

13: First - So that woman was originally the inferior.

14: And Adam was not deceived - The serpent deceived Eve: Eve did not deceive Adam, but persuaded him. "Thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife," (Ge 3:17). The preceding verse showed why a woman should not "usurp authority over the man." this shows why she ought not "to teach." She is more easily deceived, and more easily deceives. The woman being deceived transgressed - "The serpent deceived" her,(Ge 3:13), and she transgressed.

The 1599 Geneva Study Bible:
2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, 8 nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
( The first argument, why it is not lawful for women to teach in the congregation, because by this means they would be placed above men, for they would be their masters: and this is against God's ordinance.
2:13 9 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
(9) He proves this ordinance of God, by which the woman is subject to man, first because God made the woman after man, for man's sake.
2:14 10 And Adam was not g deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
(10) Then, because after sin, God gave the woman this punishment, because the man was deceived by her.
(g) Adam was deceived, but through his wife's means, and therefore she is worthily for this reason subject to her husband, and ought to be

John Nelson Darby: Synopsis to the Books of the Bible
A woman was forbidden to teach or to exercise authority over men; she was to abide in quietness and silence. The reason given for this is remarkable, and shews how, in our relations with God, everything depends on the original starting-point. In innocence Adam had the first place; in sin, Eve It was she who, being deceived, brought in transgression. Adam was not deceived, guilty as he was of disobeying God. United to his wife, he followed her, not deceived by the enemy but weak through his affection. Without the weakness, it was this which the second Adam did in grace; He followed His deceived and guilty bride, but in order to redeem and deliver her by taking her faults upon Himself.

From what I have read during my studies on this ( which may not be as much as it should have been) the reasons for this come down to orignial sin. Adam came first, Eve second, but Eve sinned first and convinced Adam to follow along. Now in today's civilized worlld our first inclination is to say "Hey that is not fair, women are different in today's world, and besides it is not fair to limit all on the case of one..." Well, that may have its merits, and it may not.

In my work in human resources we've used an interview technique called Behavioral Based Interviewing, where we aske the candidate how they acted and reacted in certain situations. The premise behind this technique is the psychologic truth that 'the best indicator of future behavior is past behavior", meaning that how a person behaved in the past is the best indication we have of how they will behave in the future. True, there are exceptions to this rule, but I have found it to be consistently the truth.

But is it fair you ask, to base the future of woman in the church on the act of one woman? Fair? I consider the divine wisdom of God to be more reliable than the dictates of societies ideals of fair and unfair. It appears that woman nature may be somewhat suspect when placed in positions of authority. Since we are not talking about physical authority such as being a CEO of a company, but are talking about Spiritual authority the stakes are much higher. What pray tell would happen if woman, in position of spiritual authority for a congregation were swayed to incorrect beliefs, then her flock would also be led astray.

Is this the popular view? No. But sometimes we must accept authority that is unpopular, and grating to our views as a secular society.
Back to top
heislove
Newbie Alert



Joined: 17 Nov 2003

Posts: 1


PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 7:38 pm    Post subject: That is absolutely right Reply with quote

I believe, and this is biblical, that a woman should not be in charge of a Man's spiritual growth. there is a reason that God gave us the roles that he did. We can only hope to decern them while we live here.
Back to top
admin
Beloved Admin



Joined: 28 Sep 2000

Posts: 88


PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 11:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My minister is a woman. If the bible promotes sexism in this fashion, then that's the point I personally would depart from scriptural teaching.
Back to top
shepreach
Princess



Joined: 01 Dec 2003

Posts: 114

Location: georgia

PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 12:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It appears that woman nature may be somewhat suspect when placed in positions of authority. Since we are not talking about physical authority such as being a CEO of a company, but are talking about Spiritual authority the stakes are much higher. What pray tell would happen if woman, in position of spiritual authority for a congregation were swayed to incorrect beliefs, then her flock would also be led astray.
(bold is my emphasis) Rolling Eyes

excuse me! Idea

It appears that man nature may be somewhat suspect when placed in positions of authority. Since we are not talking about physical authority such as being a CEO of a company, but are talking about Spiritual authority the stakes are much higher. What pray tell would happen if man, in position of spiritual authority for a congregation were swayed to incorrect beliefs, then his flock would also be led astray. Very Happy
Back to top
Van
Growing Guppy



Joined: 01 Dec 2003

Posts: 44

Location: San Clemente California

PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 6:35 am    Post subject: What does the Bible say? Reply with quote

WHY MEN ARE CHURCH ELDERS

In the New Testament, Paul writes three letters (two to Timothy and one to Titus), which contain much of the material used to structure the church. It is debatable, whether the instructions are timeless (they apply to us) or whether they are limited and only applied then because they were culturally appropriate. Those that say women should perform the same roles as men in marriage and in the church think all Paul was teaching is to behave in a culturally appropriate way to avoid needless disputes. Others think modeling submission to God in the home by women submitting to their husbands and men and women submitting to the Elders helps guide children into an understanding of obedience to a loving God.

In any event, in First Timothy 1:18, Paul says he is giving instructions so that Timothy may fight the good fight, holding on to faith and a good conscience. He then says all of us should respect authority that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness. Dropping down to First Timothy 2:11, Paul says, “A woman should learn in quietness and full submission.” He then says he does not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, she must be silent. Paul then explains his thinking that women can lead men astray (as Eve did to Adam) but they can be restored to the office of authority by bringing up their children “if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety.”

Clearly the restriction on teaching does not prevent instruction to children or in an informal setting (visiting with others) teaching men, even teaching leaders of a church, as demonstrated in Acts 18:26.

Anyway, that is my understanding of the text and the two opposing views. My church thinks modeling submission in the home and in the church concerning spiritual authority is a timeless teaching. Note that both men and women are to submit to the spiritual authority of the leaders of the local church, so the modeling is not just for women. But by modeling submission the children see a consistent pattern of behavior, hopefully leading them to decide to obey God.

Another issue is teaching without authority. On the internet, when I post that the Bible teaches this or that, the readers of the post are not under my authority, they can accept or reject what I post and they can post concurring or opposing posts. But in a local assembly, with the mandate of the members to submit to the authority of the elders, then the teaching carries more weight. God ordained this social structure to spread the gospel of Christ to the four corners of the earth. So in the church, with a married women elder, you would have the case where the husband must submit to the spiritual leadership of the woman in church and the women submit to the spiritual leadership of the husband in the home. A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.

In Genesis 3:16, God tells Eve that as part of the curse, her desire will be for her husband and he shall rule over her. This might mean lots of things, but one view is that women are cursed with the desire to have authority over men, but God ordains that men shall rule over woman. Some think this view is supported by Paul’s inspired words in 1 Corinthians 14:34, or in other words, the example from the OT is men almost exclusively being chosen by God to exercise authority in government and in temple activity. God does however use woman on some occasions such as Deborah, in a governmental role and Pricilla in a spiritual role, teaching a church leader. But even here in the spiritual role, the role is informal, and not or so it seems in a public gathering.
Back to top
shepreach
Princess



Joined: 01 Dec 2003

Posts: 114

Location: georgia

PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 9:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i have no quarrel with those who think a woman should not pastor. you do not have to attend my church. i, however, must do what God has called me to do.
deborah was more than a government figure. she was appointed by God as a judge of israel and israel was a theocracy at that time.
then there is mary. as the mother of jesus, God placed His Son in her immediate care for years. seems to me He he must have trusted her to do it right. then there is mary who carried the news of the resurrection to the 12. Jesus could have appeared to them Himself. instead He sent a woman.
as far as a husband being under the authority of his wife at church. that only holds true if he attends the church where she pastors. at any rate pastors are servants and they as well as the rest of the church are under the authority of God. if the church is what it is supposed to be there shouldn't be a conflict.
Back to top
Van
Growing Guppy



Joined: 01 Dec 2003

Posts: 44

Location: San Clemente California

PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The account of Deborah is given in the Book of Judges, chapters 4 and 5. She was a prophet of God, and she guided Israel in the defeat of Sisera. In may be that God used her, a woman, to heighten God's victory "for the Lord will sell Sisera into the hands of a woman" (Judges 4:9).
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ChristianDiscussion.com Forum Index -> Christian Bible Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 


© 2001-2007